On November 16, 2023, The Duchess of Sussex attended the Variety magazine's 2023 "Power of Women" gala at Mother Wolf in Los Angeles, California. The event celebrates the publication's Power of Women honorees, who each get their own Variety cover. The Duchess was Variety's cover star last year, but was unable to attend the gala in 2022 due to the Queen's death.
PROENZA SCHOULER Rosa One-Shoulder Maxi Dress
Duchess of Sussex looks very elegant in her dress.
ReplyDeleteMary
https://twitter.com/i/status/1725537069915594782
DeleteIt continues to surprise me that she wears so much beige after making a point of saying she was frustrated by how hard it was to wear color whilst a working royal. She doesn’t seem to be a fan of color after all. -LB
ReplyDeleteMaybe because this kind of beige has been very trendy lately.
DeleteMy thoughts exactly!
DeleteAna Katarina
Here's the story, Adult chooses skin toned dress with black accessories for an event!
DeleteResult...*roll "surprised".
Whose rules does she have to follow in 2023?
Agnes
The design of this dress is very odd & peculiar. The uneven neckline, one sided drop shoulder and too many slits creates an unattractive look. The dull beige colour does not help matters. The dress is also too long and touching the floor unlike the more manageable length shown on the model. The duchess is also sporting a very severe hairstyle which wouldn't be so bad except for that unappealing middle part.
ReplyDeleteYes, it almost looks like a 'do it yourself one-shoulder gown' - as the way it drapes makes it looks like the wearer just decided to pull on sleeve off the shoulder.
DeleteI agree on all points of dress and hair. The dress is a disaster and this hairstyle is not flattering on Meghan, Victoria, or any woman.
DeleteS
Too long right. Like no one else has long dresses 😅🤣https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRCAe3XdmbM8RR602vQ8NwAWNBYASH-1mF5Sw&usqp=CAU
DeleteLike this you mean? https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR63SC9pXopYoQqjD1Q79sxV8Q6LpoIBL4AYg&usqp=CAU
Deletehttps://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTYiLbqsrpVWLZRLfEqTeuBzt8OWcYoloSGmw&usqp=CAU
https://editorial01.shutterstock.com/wm-preview-1500/894859a/a4494bc1/Shutterstock_894859a.jpg
Boring color
ReplyDeleteFrom the first photo, I had high hopes. The colour of this dress is beatiful and suits the Duchess of Sussex well. Make-up looks beautiful. I don't know why she like the middle part, she looks much better with a side part. I like the top half of the outfit, the bottom part is a no from me.
ReplyDeleteT
Very elegant but I don't like the dress draping on the floor. The midi length of the model or a little longer in better.
ReplyDeleteFabuleuse je suis très fan
ReplyDeleteFroufrou
https://twitter.com/i/status/1725373427744403667
DeleteWe want to see more of Sophie, The Princess Royal, Anne, Edward, and other real working members of the royal family. Sally
ReplyDeleteWe see a lot of Sophie, a little of the Princess Royal and nothing of Edward. Royal men are not followed as much as royal women. One cannot tell as much about a man's suit than about a woman's dress or hair, shoes and handbags. This is a fashion side after all.
DeleteWho are "we"?
DeleteMake sure you speak in a singular voice. Unless you can’t imagine anyone having a different view.
DeletePetra
I think there are a great many who wonder why this woman is on this blog, but do not have the courage to speak out for fear of bullying. Sad on so many levels.
DeleteAnonymous17/11/23 15:59
DeleteWho are "we"? You are funny. “We” are Kate & Will. 😂 Abby
Anon. 17/11 15:50 continued
DeleteIt is obvious that "we" are the readers of this blog and other sites which show pictures and video's of the royals in Britain and Europe.
But strangely enough you don't say that under stories about Madeleine, Zara, Bea, Eugene or Märtha Louise. Take a chill pill.
DeletePersonally I think the Duchess of Sussex is really royal. Actually she needs no titel. When it comes to fashion - she has "it". It is always a pleasure to see her fashion choices.
DeleteYL
I will represent the "other we" who want to see Meghan on this blog. As a representative of the "other we", I would like to remind the "we" of their power not to read the things they don't want to read. "We" doesn't own or operate this blog, so "we" must accept the decision to post about Meghan without complaint. The "other we" find her style refreshingly different, modern and simplisticly chic. It's a lovely change of pace from the too-often dull and expected sartorial choices made by other royal women. We, the "other we", are just as tired of seeing the "we's" continuous comments about Meghan not being a royal, what colour she is wearing, what about wanting privacy, etc., none of which are about fashion. It seems we are stuck with each other. Ironically, posts about Meghan get more engagement than almost any other posts. I doubt she is going anywhere anytime soon. My thanks to all of you members of "we" for helping to keep Meghan here!
Delete12:04 and here is another one. I agree with every word you write. If we can read about Zara, Bea, Eugenie, Madeleine and Märtha without these childish complains WE should be able to do so about Meghan and Harry to.
DeleteThank you.12:04 ^^
DeleteCelebrity not royal
ReplyDeleteCelebrity is different from royal
ReplyDeleteBeing celebrity is different from being royal
ReplyDeleteAgree !!
DeleteGive it a rest 😅🤣😂
DeleteShe is royal, married to a prince. Most of the current queens and crown princesses were commoners until they married a royal person. As far as I can recall only Queen Mathilde was from a noble family. RH
DeleteAnon 15:59 She married a prince, but she feels more 'celebrity' than royal to me. She was a 'working royal' for about a minute. I class her as 'celebrity'.
Delete@Anon 15:59: Of course she is royal, yes. But she does not behave like a royal. Look at her posing in front of the photographers, it is perfectly performed celebrity behaviour to stop in front of the photographers, smile at them, look back over your shoulders, change your poses, let yourself shouted at by them. No royal will ever behave like this (just watch the BAFTA appearances of Catherine and William). She could of course behave like a royal if she wanted to, but what she wants is something completely different. Title is enough royalty. (GM)
DeleteShe certainly has no sense on how to behave as a royal. She acts like a ‘celibrity’ or as those awful Hollywood/American movies on non existing European royalty. I guess she thought she would that kind of life after marrying Harry. That been sais, I like the tophalf of the outfit. Don’t like her poses.
DeleteAnd strangly enough people whining about not be royals lack normal decency for a fellow human being themselves and probably claim to be Christians too...somebody need to read the teaching of Jesus. Wtf has happened to behaving like a grown up adult?
DeleteIst das Kleid eine Leihgabe vielleicht? Es ist viel zu lang, unruhig im Schnitt, von hinten sieht man auf anderen Bildern das es knittert, sie neigt leider immer wieder dazu, Kleidung zu tragen, die im Oberteil zu lang für sie geschnitten ist. Ein guter Schneider kürzt in der Taille, bringt das auf eine ordentliche Rocklänge ohne das es staut und am Boden putzt ; ) Auf dieser Veranstaltung gab es wesentlich schönere Kleider die auch auf die Trägerinnen viel besser passten. -Dorothe-
ReplyDeleteIch fürchte, daß ich in allen Punkten zustimmen muß... e.
DeleteMeghan looks very good. She is relaxed and her make-up is lovely. I also like her dress. The neutral beige colour is perfect for her, and I like the oblique lines of the top falling off the shoulder. At first I thought it would have looked better if it was shorter - the same length as on the model - but after a few minutes, I realise that the longer length shows the crinkle splits of the hem in a interesting and pleasing way and I quite like that.
ReplyDelete- Anon 9:13
I like it too the way Meghan is wearing it. A lot of women are still not used to the new cut of dresses, the asymmetry, the non colors like black, white and all shades of (light) beige.
DeleteDes Kaisers neue Kleider….
DeleteHört, hört, anon. 15.32
DeleteIs this dress designed to be ill-fitting? Looks strange.
ReplyDeleteI like this overall look on the Duchess, my only quibble would be the lining of the dress is white where it is visible, I would prefer it be the same beige color as the dress. S.M.
ReplyDeleteWhy is the dress so long. It takes away from the splits.Its not so much draping the floor,but dragging.Which is unfortunate as it’s an unusual design. Colour wise,beige must be the new black. Though I do recall Meghan saying she only ever wore muted colours as not to take away from other royals.
ReplyDeleteI like the pull back hair,and natural make up. Bea
HRH The Duchess of Sussex is such an elegant woman. She follows the less-is-more philosophy of true elegance. Love the lines of this beige dress that keeps the focus on her face instead of overdone frills and accessories.
ReplyDeleteShe doesn't have the HRH title.
DeleteAna Katarina
Ana Katarina, please educate yourself. Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex DOES have an HRH title. Harry and Meghan decided not to use the HRH on a daily basis but the titles were never removed. This would require action by the Privy Council and official action by the King Charles. He has not done so. Meghan is also a Princess—officially HRH Princess Henry. Much like Princess Michael of Kent
DeleteAny Brits here very well know that only working Royals are allowed to use the title HRH. Even Princess Diana lost the title when she left the family
DeleteHRH Princess Beatrice Elizabeth Mary, non-working royal
DeleteHRH Princess Eugenie Victoria Helena, non-working royal
Reading "Diana left the family" - is this Insider knowledge from Diana herself?
DeleteAnon 18.21, seems you confuse something, they are born princesses, aren't they?
DeleteAnon 11:33 Harry was born a prince. Have you read how many times people here have insisted he is no longer a prince, he should not be shown here because he is not a working royal, or insisting wrongly that he does not have his HRH? As his wife, Meghan receives her titles through him. The subject is moot, yet the trolls continue to troll.
DeleteGorgeous, absolutely gorgeous!
ReplyDeleteTrès jolie robe asymétrique de couleur camel mais j'aurais aimé voir les chaussures cachées par la longueur !
ReplyDeleteI think with the body she has, she can wear any type of dress.
ReplyDeleteIn particular, this form of dress is perfect for her.
She is a modern woman in her simplicity.
VERY NICE THE COLOR
https://twitter.com/i/status/1725402159267643580
DeleteThe dress looks to my untrained eye like a final project from a fashion design course that wins a prize for being edgy but doesn’t really suit anyone. It may have come off better in a beautiful colour (such as a deep red), which this dead neutral is not. That said, the wearer here pulls it off due to her confidence and poise and experience posing for cameras. (Grace)
ReplyDeleteWhy can't she seem to be able to find a good tailor? The top of this dress is gorgeous. But the bottom is so disappointing. It's way too long and way too many slits. If those are her shoes from the picture, fabulous.
ReplyDeleteChel
You mean like this...https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRCAe3XdmbM8RR602vQ8NwAWNBYASH-1mF5Sw&usqp=CAU
Deletehttps://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/catherine-duchess-of-cambridge-patron-of-100-women-in-news-photo-1633467589.jpg
Kudos to the person that found these links. I thought about examples like this but you took the time to bring the proof! Well done!
DeleteProbably Meghan herself
DeleteMeghan always looks great and is so refreshing after seeing the stuffy brits in their boring, same old. Kate looks good but the rest of them are just..."yawn". Meghan is always fresh and natural and gorgeous from the inside out!
ReplyDeleteYou write” natural”:and anonymus 14:45 wrote: “relaxed”:
Deletejust the two things I think she never is.
She has great taste for fashion and a lovely bodytype, but for me she seems always faking and acting.
Mabel
Ooh, ouch, who are the stuffy brits in their boring, same old?
DeleteAgree to Mabel and what is it, anon20.19?
DeleteTina
I saw a short Daily M. clip showing that there is quite a big "bubble" on the back of the off-the-shoulder side. I thought maybe this is because this way the gown could be worn on-the-shoulder too, I don't really know. The designer ought to have decided what the preferred mode of wearing the dress is and make it accordingly because the blob is really awkward. (GM)
ReplyDeleteThe DoS looks perfect, simply amazing. Very muted and elegant.
ReplyDeleteStrange my first comment about why is this woman featured on this blog was censored. FREEDOM OF SPEECH !! I can say that without being rude, it is freedom of speech. This woman wanted privacy, refused to work with the royal family, hurt the Queen and the rest of the family with her terrible remarks. Why is she featured here? I do not understand, she is not a working royal. Sally
ReplyDeleteFor me, she can be on this blog. She has a unique fashion style compared to other royals (which this blog is about) and she is married to a prince. Freedom of my speech :-)
DeleteYou are not obliged to read and comment on this blogpost. You do have the choice to just skip the posts that do not interest you. But strangely enough there are often more comments on posts about her than on posts about 'real' royalty. I hope all the haters realise they add to the reason why the press publishes so much about her.
I like this dress, the length looks better on Meghan than on the model. It's a bit bland to my taste but the colour suits her.
Damsel Dragonfly
@Anonymous17/11/23 23:59 - Well said.
DeleteIf the person who owns, runs, and administers this board wants to put her on this website, that's their decision, not yours. All you have to do is not click on stories of people you don't like.
DeleteSally I totally agree. We all have different views of the world but we are censored when critic styles of different royals esp Charlene. It's like comments are supposed to be sweet and lovely all the time, it's not the real world people
DeleteMs
You know it's amazing what you can do with your keyboard.
DeleteJust a few clicks and you can say "bye-bye dear Duchess of Sussex" and turn your attention to the working royals.
Sally you are completely wrong. Sadly you have belived the british tabloids narrativ. They never said they wanted privacy. And they have never refused to work for the firm or support them. As their spokesperson said when the Netflix series came out:-Their statement announcing their decision to step back mentions nothing of privacy and reiterates their desire to continue their roles and public duties.
Delete'Any suggestion otherwise speaks to a key point of this series. They are choosing to share their story, on their terms, and yet the tabloid media has created an entirely untrue narrative that permeates press coverage and public opinion. The facts are right in front of them'.
In fact the Sussex's said stepping down:-“After many months of reflection and internal discussions, we have chosen to make a transition this year in starting to carve out a progressive new role within this institution. We intend to step back as ‘senior’ members of the Royal Family and work to become financially independent, while continuing to fully support Her Majesty The Queen.
It is with your encouragement, particularly over the last few years, that we feel prepared to make this adjustment.
We now plan to balance our time between the United Kingdom and North America, continuing to honour our duty to The Queen, the Commonwealth, and our patronages.
This geographic balance will enable us to raise our son with an appreciation for the royal tradition into which he was born, while also providing our family with the space to focus on the next chapter, including the launch of our new charitable entity.
We look forward to sharing the full details of this exciting next step in due course, as we continue to collaborate with Her Majesty The Queen, The Prince of Wales, The Duke of Cambridge and all relevant parties. Until then, please accept our deepest thanks for your continued support.”
So can we please stop. Just stop!
Thank you anonymous 13:21. I love when people post actual facts.
DeleteFacts, really??
DeleteAnonymous 11:35, yes facts because she posted their statement exactly as written. That's how you define a fact.
DeleteSince when is a statment a "fact"? Mon dieu...
DeleteTina
Anonymus 18:50. A Statement is a fact when used to counter someone who thinks they know what the statement said and argues a point that can be disproved by the Statement.
DeleteProbably Meghan herself refering to her own prevous statments..no one here is more interested in her than her self.
DeleteLooks like a sloppy mess
ReplyDeleteThe Duchess of Sussex looks very elegant. Beige is not a boring colour, it is like black and white, always classic and never out of style.
ReplyDeletemjt
The Duchess looks lovely, but I don't like this gown at all. The design is strange. The bodice drape does* not sit well, from the back there is a distinct bulge. The front split and length of skirt does not balance, if it was a little shorter it might look better. The beige color is bland and I normally love beige colors, but not this one. The idea of the gown is there but the overall look is just bland and off set. The black accessories are a no.
ReplyDeleteHer hair pulled back looks fabulous. Makeup is on point, subtle and natural.
Previously there would be a suggestion of what color would balance out an outfit. Now the critiques just roll in. True, both Mary and Letizia's version of the dress were shorter, but lining the dress is the real reason for the bulky look.
DeleteAgnes
Her outfits never quite fit. She always tries too hard.
ReplyDeleteIs it a night
ReplyDeleteIs it a nightqown ? I don’t get it?’
ReplyDeleteRegardless her polemical profile, one must recognise that Meghan looks perfect. Spectacular look, well done!
ReplyDeleteAgree - Stunning.
DeleteWhat is a polemical profile, please?
DeleteDisagree.
DeleteVery elegant gown. I like it. css
ReplyDeleteShe is more of a celebrity than an royal. It is a shame you put her on this board. The dress is not well tailored way too long.
ReplyDeleteHmmmm https://editorial01.shutterstock.com/wm-preview-1500/894859a/a4494bc1/Shutterstock_894859a.jpg
Deletehttps://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/d8/images/canvas/2022/04/01/11c9020a-dfe1-4e14-b4ed-1d33df203768_e865efe2.jpg
https://i0.wp.com/www.thecourtjeweller.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2021-0813-anne03.jpg?resize=1200%2C2211&ssl=1
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS4IilPwhNp64kiu84HqFE4u4NHCm61cf-Gfw&usqp=CAU
Sie war, ist und bleibt einfach nur eine Schauspielerin.
ReplyDeleteGenau !
DeleteAnd Grace Kelly?
Deletereally compare d.m. with gracia patricia? ;)
DeleteI would prever parents with a ruined partypieces shop.
DeleteI do not believe she belongs on this site. She is not a "working" royal. Both Harry and Megan decided they wanted to,walk away from Royal duties.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, the color of the dress reminds me of Tamara, the dancing sausage. I still think the color suits Meghan - even though she always complained that she had to wear this color so as not to stand out among the other senior royals.
ReplyDeleteI think the shape of the dress is ok, but once again it's an outfit that's too long for her.
I really like her makeup and hairstyle.
The dress is not long Meghan is short & she can't carry the length. Overall unappealing.
ReplyDeleteLol she told us she wore neutrals as a member of the royal family because she wasn't allowed to wear colours. Why she still wearing only beige, black, white, navy?? 90% of the time. Lol could it be that it wasn't the royal family after all. She sure likes her beige.
ReplyDeleteYou do realize that she does not work for them anymore and can wear what she wants, at whatever price point she chooses. This leaves you eyes peeled looking for the most irrelevant things to comment on as you gallantly represent a family that will NeveR give you the time of day. Enjoy!
DeleteAnon 17:54..Meghan is that you? LOL
DeleteOh Markle, europeans are monarchs a thing you should have known if you would have read upon some history before arriving here. The only one seeking a familys approval, and later fighting the same, is you. If you would have watched enough seasons by now you should have known that everyone protects the crown, no matter the family under it..a crown you will never be a part of..no matter the country.
DeleteI’m not a great fan of one-shoulder dresses but when I look at the overall picture of the Duchess, I see understated elegance.
ReplyDeleteI see a mess, perhaps because of my glasses…
DeleteI see nothing has changed lately. We have still not learned how to behave as a grown up. Og, well haters will be haters.
ReplyDelete@Anon 10:16 "We have still not learned how to behave..." Oh dear ... just try it for yourself, it is not hopeless if you really want to. Good beginning: stop talking about "we". (GM)
DeleteHate can almost become a drug. Not nice. Can have a bad effect on your health.
DeleteThis is embarrassing GM should stop reading the Daily Mail. And please stop being blind over the hate Meghan gets. It shouting out of this tread. So again, so called grown-ups, adults don't behave like this at least they shouldn't. Because if this is the norm I sincerely hope WE don't have kids or grandchildren. Some role models...
DeleteSo true. The haters must have sad life's.
DeleteI do not see hate speech here, just opinions. I can stand it ;)
DeleteHatred makes people blind.
Deletethe way she behave and move herself around to the camera is not the way Royalty behaves but more as a celebrity , ok she looks good but the dress is a mess and doesn’t fit her well, she lost a lot off weight and it makes her look older.
ReplyDeleteWould it kill you to try to behave like an adult?
DeleteAnonymous, Greet’s comment doesn’t warrant a snarky response. I agree with Anonymous that Meghan acts as a celebrity, not a royal and I disagree that she looks older. You can state your opinion without the personal miaow! (Jane)
Delete@Greet. Show us the royalty behavior rule book? She is back to the size she was when they went to the first Invictus games in Canada.
DeleteAgnes
Just a little info on who was responsible for The Duchess’s gown.
ReplyDeletePROENZA SCHOULER is a New York based fashion house created about 20 years ago by two guys, Jack McCollough and Lazaro Hernandez.
They also do a very “must-have” range of handbags.
Some information in an article by Vogue (Sept. 2022) via ……..
https://www.vogue.com/slideshow/vogue100-proenza-schouler-nyfw-2022
Again some quite (and only quite) good education.
DeleteYou people 😅🤣 Meghan is stunning. And complaining about that, she has confidence and knows how to carry herself in public is just ridiculous and speaks volums about yourself. Low, low, low...
ReplyDeleteWow! Very beautifull and elegant. Well done!
ReplyDeleteShe looks very elegant and stylisch.
ReplyDeleteThe dress is a mess with the odd bit floating around the back of the neck area, too long, and why is she on this blog? They stepped away from Royal duties how long ago? They have both said and done things that hurt the Royal family, as well as the late Queen Elizabeth. She still acts like a celebrity, when in fact she was a D-list actress in some TV program. We do not see other 'non royals featured on this blog, please leave her to the Privacy she and Henry/Harry asked for. Edwina
ReplyDeleteFor RH: It's easy to overlook Stephanie of Luxembourg as one of the royal women who were born noble. She doesn't have as high of a profile as the others. However, I believe when Stephanie married she was Countess Stephanie de Lannoy. - Joann
ReplyDelete@Lily Bart. As a regular contributor to this blog, it is surprising that this style appears so 'odd'. Both Princess Mary and Queen Letizia have worn this silhouette before to many positive comments. Mary's was sequined and Letizia's was navy with a rope detail.
ReplyDeleteWhen you look at a garment try to be dispassionate and understand what went into the construction. For instance there is a lining visible in some pictures which is why the dress does not pool on the floor as an unlined dress would. The same applies to why there seems to be too much fabric in the back. The top is also lined, perhaps for the sake of modesty.
*She married a man. He puts his trousers on one leg at a time just like any other, and has to take care of his family like every other Dad. He chose not to live at the taxpayers' expense as a prince to peasants who feel they own his soul.
This post comes under the heading of "nit-picking", but I thought everyone would still be interested. This is in reference to statement released by Harry and Meghan when they announced their intention to live independent lives while working for the royal family. It was posted above by Anonymous 13:21 who posted it as it originally appeared in the press. However, at the time there was some criticism leveled at Harry and Meghan over the statement. In the last paragraph they said ".... as we continue to collaborate with Her Majesty the Queen." The critics were quick to point out that one does not "collaborate" with the Queen. One serves at the Queen's pleasure. The critics further charged that the couple were trying to put themselves on the same level as the Queen. For myself, I believe the statement was written by a member of their staffs and no one caught the error before it was released to the press. Harry, having been raised about royal protocol, most likely would not have said that. I wish I could find the link where this criticism was written, but I'm pressed for time just now. A google search would probably turn it up somewhere. - Joann
ReplyDeleteWhether they served or collaborated (usually with the Queen's) staff is immaterial. They were still willing to work for her. This post is about fashion not semantics. There are other blogs that cater to your need to rehash 4 year old news.
DeleteWOW, SO MANY REACTIONS FOR SOMEONE WHO IS NOT CONSIDERED AS A ROYAL ANYMORE. SHE MUST FEEL MORE IMPORTANT NOW THAN SHE WAS BEFORE, DO NOT MISUNDERSTAND ME I AM NOT AGAINST HER OR ANYBODY ELSE, I HAVE ALWAYS LIKED HARRY AND MEGHAN AND I STILL DO. AS A NEUTRAL I MUST ADMIT THAT SO MANY CRITICS POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE JUST MAKE THEM MORE POPULAR THAN EVER. IT IS PUBLICITY FOR THEM. (a non British anonymous)
ReplyDeleteExactly, stop commenting and stop sharing
DeleteNothing gets as trolly, nasty and divisive as a post about Meghan. It would probably keep this blog happier and kinder to not post about her at all, unless attending a royal event, but instead to stick to working royals. Some of the comebacks on this particular post are so smart and sure and reference-based that one wonders (as several other commenters have suggested) whether Meghan herself has written them. I wouldn’t be surprised. (Grace)
ReplyDeleteRight...so where is the stupid comments about not being a working royals when Helen shares outing from all the other non working royals. Has never seen that stupidity about a story about Madeleine or Zara, or Bea, or Eugenie and so on. This comment from you say all we need to know about "Grace". And please stop embarrasing yourself with conspiracy theories. Anna.
DeleteHi Anna, I seem to have upset you by sharing my observation that no posts get as much nastiness as those about Meghan. My observation is based on the reality that her posts do get - by far - the most comments, and the most nasty and finger-pointing comments. I wasn’t meaning to offend anyone but to make a suggestion on how we can get back to the nice place this used to be. Your personal critique of me does rather confirm my observation! I wish you all the best and am not sure why you’re angry at me but quite enjoyed you calling my little joke a conspiracy theory! (Grace)
DeleteOMG! Is this what you learn your kids? No wonder kids continue to bully each other with these role models. Where did normal decency go? How many of you go to church on sunday and praise the lord like nothing has happend? Do you ever think about how proud he must be seeing his bullying dominion. Shocked. Just shocked.
ReplyDeleteOh stop St Anonymous. Any opinion that differs from yours is bullying? Stop it yourself. Any negativity present she brought upon herself.
DeleteDarling, this is a fashion blog where pople share their opinions about fashion..yes it can get wild sometimes..girls have their strong opinions. But keep jesus, God, the bible and the rest in other appropriate forums (maybe in an american all girls church school) majority here are europeans having normal relationships with faith. Thank you!
Delete“St Anonymous” is one of the funniest things I’ve seen on this forum. I can’t believe how many Anonymouses are writing here and are so outraged.. or is it just one?! Never have I seen so many “Stop. Just stop” responses … although what they should stop is not clarified?!?Someone further up noted that never are the comments as poisonous as in response to Meghan posts - agree! - wouldn’t it be kinder and simpler to no longer post pics of Meghan here, Helen? - Yours kindly, Another Anonymous ;-)
Delete@19:20 Why should Helen take advice from someone who as an adult cannot does not have the comprehension to comment on an appearance at an event; cannot build a following of your own on any topic allows oneself to fall victim to second hand outrage stirred by tabloids. Someone posts are like popcorn, just filler.
ReplyDeleteAnon
Quite confused by the word order and intention of this last comment (“as an adult”? “popcorn”? …) but more confused why so many of the comments in this post contain personal criticisms of fellow commenters in what used to be a kind and fun forum. Anyone else?! - MJ.
DeleteMJ One hopes there are no children adding to the poor comprehension skills of some posters. The dress, and accessories are fair game. The person..no ! No one asked who she married, or if she disappointed your grandmother . The family will solve their differences without the second hand outrage. As for popcorn, it is a cheap filler with no nutrition /fashion value. as are many 'opinions.'
DeleteI, for one, wish these two would have taken a couple more steps back.
ReplyDeletePost a Comment
(We will not publish anonymous comments that were posted without stating a name or nickname)