| Countess Sophie of Wessex, Prince Albert II of Monaco and Prince Alwaleedbin Talal Al Saud attends the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation Dinner In Honour Of Winston Churchill at Sotheby's on October 29, 2015 in London, England. |
Prince Albert of Monaco Foundation dinner in honour of Winston Churchill
Mais où est encore et toujours Charlène ? Si elle était venue, elle aurait retrouvé l'une de ses prétendue amie Sophie !
ReplyDeletePrince Edward visited Ryerson's Digital Media Zone - their daughter is a Teenager... they can work a lot.
ReplyDeleteRegal Countess Sophie, quietly hard working, dedicated to HM The Monarchy, GB and the people.
ReplyDeleteSophie is one of my favorite royal ladies!
ReplyDeleteSophie 's dress should have wore better, by a younger and a more slender women, like Duchess Catherine.
ReplyDeleteMaybe this Ocasion goes not with a young mother and if you look Sophie is not really relaxed as on other ocasions. The duchess, who is a bit ill (she is very thin) should get better and if she is doing an ocasion her husband the Prince of Wales should join her.
DeleteSophie is sophisticated and very good looking with her blue eyes and blond hair. She is always a lovingly decent Lady like Lady Diana.
DeleteAnd yet an other event and no Charlene.
ReplyDeleteWhy does this woman rarely appears with her husband to support him ?
This make me believe the rumors that the wedding is just a mere facade .
Caroline
What about the other royal couples who are not surgical attached to their hip? Victoria does more with her father then her husband. do we come with roumers about them. No. ..why not? Edward was not here either...hmmm trouble in paradise...There are different way of doing receptions in different countries. And remember she has two 10 month old babies at home and Albert was in Italy and England for several days. Why is it OK for a princess from another country to not attend a function because she have to travel away from her kids, but not Charlene?
ReplyDeleteNo need to be surgical attached , Anonimous 16,24 .
DeleteBut who can deny that Princesse Charlene is rarely at the side of her husband , expecially in official international events ? Not to mention family events (remember Pierre&Bea wedding , she didn't show up , what a shame! ) .
As for the babies, well not only her has babies, other royals have babies but do a great job representing their country . She doesn't look that active, to say it all .
She gained a lot with her marriage, think some more effort to give back what she obtained (which is very much indeed) would be expected .
Caroline .
The family didn´t invite her. Look at the pictures non of them is ever by Charlenes side.
DeleteIt looks very much that they don´t like her and her family at all. That is very, very sad for all of them.
Hopefully they will find love.
Albert and Charlene was not at the second wedding no, but they both was at the first and even held the arrangement. They both had reason not to be there as you should have known had you keept up with what they do...and talking about babies and royals...yeah right..Madeleine do I need say more.
DeleteMadeleine is not and never will be the main lady of a royal house, Charlene is but does not show.
DeleteWhere is Charlène?
ReplyDeleteGood question, on ocasions where royal couples appear together Prince Albert often appears alone or with his sisters. Some people have the feeling, that they don´t see a loved Charlene and taken care for Princess Charlene. Lately it is to judge a book by his cover
DeleteShouldn't you ask where is Edward too?
DeleteDo you go to your work with your husband?or wife?
ReplyDeleteCome on,try to understand what means a royal job!
Countess Sophie has 23 official engagements scheduled for November Why is a 50 year old woman with young children, married to the Queen's 4th child, wayyyy down the line of succession, why is she putting in more work than The Duke Of Cambridge who will be King?
ReplyDeleteSophie has a sense of duty and a work ethic.
And Charlene has none.
DeletePost a Comment
(We will not publish anonymous comments that were posted without stating a name or nickname)